Ackermann's function is rarely defined the same way twice. We would not presume to buck
such a~well-established precedent. Here is a~slight variant.''}
We will use the definition by double recursion given by Tarjan \cite{tarjan:setunion},
-which is predominant in the literature on graph algorithms:
+which is predominant in the literature on graph algorithms.
\defn\id{ackerdef}%
The \df{Ackermann's function} $A(x,y)$ is a~function on non-negative integers defined as follows:
&= A(2,A(2,4)) = 2\tower(2\tower 4) = 2\tower 65536. \cr
}$$
-\para
-Three functions related to the inverse of the function~$A$ are usually considered:
+\paran{Inverses}%
+As common for functions of multiple parameters, there is no single function which
+could claim the title of the only true Inverse Ackermann's function.
+The following three functions related to the inverse of the function~$A$ are often considered:
\defn\id{ackerinv}%
The \df{$i$-th row inverse} $\lambda_i(n)$ of the Ackermann's function is defined by: